'Star Wars' despots vs. 'Star Trek' populists

international | arts and media | other press

Wednesday September 15, 2004 15:55

by redjade

Why is George Lucas peddling an elitist, anti-democratic agenda under the guise of escapist fun?

"Star Wars" despots vs. "Star Trek" populists
http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/1999/06/15/brin_main/print.html
By David Brin

By now it's grown clear that George Lucas has an agenda, one that he takes very seriously. After four "Star Wars" films, alarm bells should have gone off, even among those who don't look for morals in movies. When the chief feature distinguishing "good" from "evil" is how pretty the characters are, it's a clue that maybe the whole saga deserves a second look.

Just what bill of goods are we being sold, between the frames?

Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow.

- "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability.
- Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough.
- True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited.
- Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.

[....]

Can we learn more about the "Star Wars" worldview by comparing George Lucas' space-adventure epic to its chief competitor -- "Star Trek?"

The differences at first seem superficial. One saga has an air force motif (tiny fighters) while the other appears naval. In "Star Trek," the big ship is heroic and the cooperative effort required to maintain it is depicted as honorable. Indeed, "Star Trek" sees technology as useful and essentially friendly -- if at times also dangerous. Education is a great emancipator of the humble (e.g. Starfleet Academy). Futuristic institutions are basically good-natured (the Federation), though of course one must fight outbreaks of incompetence and corruption. Professionalism is respected, lesser characters make a difference and henchmen often become brave whistle-blowers -- as they do in America today.

In "Star Trek," when authorities are defied, it is in order to overcome their mistakes or expose particular villains, not to portray all institutions as inherently hopeless. Good cops sometimes come when you call for help. Ironically, this image fosters useful criticism of authority, because it suggests that any of us can gain access to our flawed institutions, if we are determined enough -- and perhaps even fix them with fierce tools of citizenship.

By contrast, the oppressed "rebels" in "Star Wars" have no recourse in law or markets or science or democracy. They can only choose sides in a civil war between two wings of the same genetically superior royal family. They may not meddle or criticize. As Homeric spear-carriers, it's not their job.

save preference

Comments (2 of 2)

jayzhus weeps!

by seven of nine

Wed Sep 15, 2004 16:38

there are no civilians in star trek. *Everyone* has gone through starfleet academy. And if they haven't they've at least bombed an Iraqi nuclear reactor before they get that place on a USS federation space craft.
Not a single "alien" species appears without being completely militarised and "on loan" or "special observer duty".
learning how to load a photo torpedo tube is like learning "an droimean donn dilis" off by rote for those people!
And check out the competitors- there is definitely something well sinister about the national stereotypes buried in the Klingons, Romulans, the Cardasians, never mind the Borg.

it's very real for some people (i.e., trekkies)

by capitan cork - klingon_undies@rte.ie

Thu Sep 16, 2004 06:56

regardless of what lucas says, some people take star wars VERY seriously...

"German radio starts Klingon service"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3658310.stm

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Voltaire Network

'Star Wars' despots vs. 'Star Trek' populists

Comments (2 of 2)