North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Reform: We Will Fight to Close Migrant Hotels Sun May 04, 2025 15:00 | Richard Eldred
Reform UK Chairman Zia Yusuf says the party will use every lever available ? including legal action ? to stop asylum seekers being housed in areas where it now controls councils.
The post Reform: We Will Fight to Close Migrant Hotels appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The ?Chinese Vampire Will Suck UK?s Blood?, Says Trump?s Tariff Chief Sun May 04, 2025 13:00 | Richard Eldred
Donald Trump's trade adviser has slammed Britain's relationship with China, warning the UK is in danger of becoming a "compliant servant of communist China" and having its "blood sucked" by Beijing.
The post The ?Chinese Vampire Will Suck UK?s Blood?, Says Trump?s Tariff Chief appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
We Shouldn?t Increase Spending on Children With Special Educational Needs. We Should Cut It Sun May 04, 2025 11:00 | Mary Gilleece
The UK's SEND sector is an expensive, infantilising job-creation scheme for middle-aged women that fails to improve outcomes and urgently needs cutting back, argues Mary Gilleece.
The post We Shouldn?t Increase Spending on Children With Special Educational Needs. We Should Cut It appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Tory MP Esther McVey Thinks Net Zero is a ?Dud? Having Spent Years Inflicting it On the British Publ... Sun May 04, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison
A person identifying as Esther McVey told Mike Graham on Talk earlier this week that "Net Zero was a dud". Surely this could not be the Esther McVey who spent years inflicting it on the British public, says Chris Morrison.
The post Tory MP Esther McVey Thinks Net Zero is a “Dud” Having Spent Years Inflicting it On the British Public appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Brad Pitt Should Get Guy Ritchie to Rejig Adolescence for its Second Season Sun May 04, 2025 07:00 | James Alexander
Prof James Alexander has finally given in and watched Adolescence. It's so bad, he says, that for the second season Brad Bitt should get Guy Ritchie to come in and ensure all the irritating characters are duly shot.
The post Brad Pitt Should Get Guy Ritchie to Rejig Adolescence for its Second Season appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 6 5 4 3 2 1As things stand, the Gardai have now backed down from their attempts to have us sign legal “adult cautions”, now asking individuals to accept “informal cautions” which are not legally binding and appear to be something made up in the hope of keeping face.
On behalf of the FEE members threatened with these cautions I would like to thank everyone who supported us in our conviction that peaceful direct action is a legitimate form of protest and doesn't warrant arrests or legal proceedings. The threatened cautions, like our original arrests were merely a method of intimidating protesters and stifling any potential anti fees movements from growing, in much the same way as many of us have witnessed the legal mechanisms being manipulated to crush workers’ and students struggles across the globe in the last year, and so must be resisted in every instance where they are applied. Your correspondence with Paul Gogarty and the Lucan Garda station undoubtedly contributed to their backing down in our case. I would like to express my personal gratitude to all of you as well as my solidarity with the similar struggles many of you are facing.
Conall- UCD FEE
I was at a Hallow'een Party tonight for kids and asked one of the parents who is a senior Guard in Tallaght what would canvassing the local Gardai do.
He said that it would probably piss the Gardai in question off big time and make them even less likely to drop charges if there was any discretion involved. And the views of the victim could be overruled in certain circumstances he said.
Regarding who the victim is, you make a fair comment about Gogarty being the legal victim rather than the staff member. But in the report by the University Observer it suggests that he didn't seek to press charges for the alleged use of the computer. Why didn't he do this if he was already pressing charges for the protest?
I think you are incorrect in suggesting that he is the one with the power to press charges rather than the staff at the office who would have had to be the ones giving statements. Surely their statements provided the evidence that led to charges being pressed?
Secondly, wouldn't it be in Gogarty's interests to be 'magnaminous' from his own viewpoint in relation to FEE, given that the Greens seem to have prevented third level fees from being introduced, which student bodies have welcomed. The fact that he hasn't done this already suggests that he is not in a position to do so.
Where does the law stand on this? I think it is legal to barricade an office during a peaceful protest. Is it legal to do so with a staff member in there? Some contributors have suggested that the staff member stayed in voluntarily. If this is the case, well and good. But if at any stage the member of staff was not free to go, because a physical barrier was put up for example, then this could blur the lines legally.
Any advice from someone who knows the laws of the land would be appreciated, because with two days to go the protesters have limited time to get off. I am just afraid that what is going on now will be counterproductive.
To answer Ken's questions:
1) Does contacting the Gardai directly actually have an influence, or will it be counterproductive to the cause?
Yes. This is a matter in the hands of the Gardai. It is up to them to just drop it. If they understand that there is considerable outrage at this attempt to punish peaceful protesters, it may persuade them to back down.
2) If Gogarty is persuaded to take action, would he be able to put pressure on the Gardai to have the case dropped? Previous reports state he wasn't actually there on the day the protest took place. Surely his pleas would be ignored if this is true? In fairness to him the logic of this legally also means that he would have had no powers to seek a prosecution either.
This is what Gogarty is saying in his stock replies to the protest emails. However, if you read the Garda document on "Adult Cautions", you will see:
"Before the offence and the offender are considered for the application of a caution, the views of any victims must, if reasonably possible, be sought."
In other words, Gogarty does have considerable power to intervene here - and massive pressure should be put on him to make sure he does. (Gogarty is the so-called victim here by the way, see answer to third question)
3) Would the person to ask to have the charges dropped not be the staff member who made the statement to the Gardai in the first place. Why isn't he/she being approached? Can someone clarify as to whether putting a rational argument to the person in question would be legal or not?
No. The adult caution is being threatened under some section of the Public Order Act. Therefore the charge relates to the occupying of the building - not any interaction with the staff member (which the Gardai were ridiculously threatening us with patently untrue kidnapping charges at one stage!) Therefore the "victim" is Gogarty, not the staff member as it's his office. So pressure on him is important.
Pressure is coming on - so much so that Gogarty has set up a stock email response. Keep the pressure up. Phone calls would be particularly effective!
Thanks to all who have contacted them so far!
Paul Gogarty TD most definitely has the ability to stop this.
The alleged offence (democratic and peaceful protest) took place at his office and it is at his behest that this is happening. Gardai rarely follow up these types of cases - they have actual and real crimes to keep them busy and occupied.
The last person I remember doing this was Bertie Ahern some ten years ago who had anti racist campaigners prosecuted for a similar peaceful protest at St Lukes.
Its worth remembering that this is the same Paul Gogarty TD who told anti war protestors blockading the Dail protesting against the war in Iraq to stop their protest, get up off the ground and go home because he wanted to drive his car out. Needless to say he was listened to and the blockade continued.
What is the point of this in the overall scheme of things? Would a media campaign not be better.
1) Does contacting the Gardai directly actually have an influence, or will it be counterproductive to the cause?
2) If Gogarty is persuaded to take action, would he be able to put pressure on the Gardai to have the case dropped? Previous reports state he wasn't actually there on the day the protest took place. Surely his pleas would be ignored if this is true? In fairness to him the logic of this legally also means that he would have had no powers to seek a prosecution either.
3) Would the person to ask to have the charges dropped not be the staff member who made the statement to the Gardai in the first place. Why isn't he/she being approached? Can someone clarify as to whether putting a rational argument to the person in question would be legal or not?
Ken Downes
Hi all at FEE,
Well done, again, on this occupation and your continuing tireless work to keep education fee-free in Ireland. I've sent an email to EVERY TD, Senator, and MEP in the country on your behalf.
I hope this small act helps you in some way.
Regards,
Mark C.