North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Almost a Million Young Britons Idle as Migrant Workforce Soars Sat Aug 23, 2025 19:00 | Richard Eldred
Almost a million young Britons under 25 are out of work while migrant youth employment has quadrupled, prompting calls for a "future workforce credit" to get Brits into jobs and ease rising welfare costs.
The post Almost a Million Young Britons Idle as Migrant Workforce Soars appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Brighton Council Latest to Take Down St George?s Flags Sat Aug 23, 2025 17:22 | Richard Eldred
Brighton has become the latest council to start taking down St George's flags, with removals on hold after contractors faced verbal abuse.
The post Brighton Council Latest to Take Down St George?s Flags appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The ?Zombie? Net Zero Levy Adding Billions to Britain?s Energy Bills Sat Aug 23, 2025 15:00 | Richard Eldred
A 'zombie' Net Zero levy, set up under Tony Blair to boost renewables, is still eating billions from household energy bills, even though it closed to new entrants in 2017 ? and it's only set to get worse.
The post The ?Zombie? Net Zero Levy Adding Billions to Britain?s Energy Bills appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Rise of the Name Muhammad Across Europe Sat Aug 23, 2025 13:21 | Richard Eldred
Across Europe, baby boys named Muhammad and its variants have shot up by as much as 700% since 2000, thanks to growing Muslim communities and mass immigration.
The post The Rise of the Name Muhammad Across Europe appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
British Paralympians Turn Backs During Israeli National Anthem Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:00 | Richard Eldred
Sanctions are being demanded after Britain's wheelchair basketball team turned their backs on Israel's anthem in a gesture slammed as "deeply disrespectful" and an attack on sporting dignity.
The post British Paralympians Turn Backs During Israeli National Anthem appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 4 3 2 1www.couragetoresist.org/canada
Unfortunately USAians do that too because they also don't want to be identified with their country. And given that Canada is busy backing up US imperial policy by providing troops for Afghanistan the mantle of "nice Canadians" is wearing a bit ragged.
I think that's at the heart of this. People cannot agree to to something when they KNOW that the other person who is asking for the agreement has an entirely different understanding of what agreement would mean.
Let's say "person X has a right to Y" (suppose we agree to that)
A) Do we all agree that means "no person Z may take Y away from X"?
Yes, I think we can safely say that we are agreed that this is a direct consequence of "person X has a right to Y"
B) Do we all agree that means "if person X lacks Y and it is in the ability of person Z to supply Y to X then person Z is OBLIGATED to do so"?
No, we are not all agreed. PLEASE -- I am not asking whether you also accept this statement (or not) but just to recognize that not all people would. They might all agree "it would be nice of person Z to do so" or "it would be praiseworthy of person Z to do so". But I assure you that there are people who would not accept "person Z is obligated to do so" as long as "A" didn't apply (in other words, as long as we aren't talking about a situation where person Z had taken Y away from person X in the first place -- as long as person Z hadn't CAUSED the situation).
THAT is why neither a Canadian nor a US administration can "agree" --- because the people who are asking for the agreement clearly have the understanding that accepting "people have a right to water" implies the obligation to supply water to those who lack it and too many Canadians and too many of us here in the States would not accept that interpretation. Not all of us, but far too many to have "agreement". It is as simple as that.
We need to distinguish between Canadian people and the actions of their government; is there a way to lobby Canada government on this matter?