Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Why War Trumps Peace Sun Apr 27, 2025 17:29 | Ramesh Thakur
What if warfare is the normal condition of human society, and peace the exception that requires explanation? Ramesh Thakur looks at some longstanding conflicts and asks how peace might be finally achieved.
The post Why War Trumps Peace appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
In Defence of Adolescence: A Deeply Subversive Satire of Post-Liberal Britain Sun Apr 27, 2025 15:00 | Michael Rainsborough
Michael Rainsborough watched Adolescence expecting to see stale, regime propaganda. In fact, he thinks it's a deeply subversive, vituperative satire of post-liberal Britain.
The post In Defence of Adolescence: A Deeply Subversive Satire of Post-Liberal Britain appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Vancouver Crash: Several Dead After Car Drives Into Crowd Sun Apr 27, 2025 13:00 | Toby Young
Several people are dead and multiple others injured after a car drove into a crowd at a Filipino street party in Vancouver. The suspect was known to the police.
The post Vancouver Crash: Several Dead After Car Drives Into Crowd appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Moderna Faces Suspension For Offering Children ?1,500 and Teddy Bears to Take Part in Covid Vaccine ... Sun Apr 27, 2025 11:00 | Toby Young
Moderna could face suspension from Britain's pharmaceutical trade body because it offered children ?1,500 and teddy bears to take place in Covid vaccine trials.
The post Moderna Faces Suspension For Offering Children ?1,500 and Teddy Bears to Take Part in Covid Vaccine Trials appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Declined: Chapter 17: Butterflies Sun Apr 27, 2025 09:00 | Molly Kingsley
Chapter 17 of Declined is here ? a dystopian satire by Molly Kingsley about the emergence of a social credit system in the UK. This week: Theo watches others leave re-education camp but he's stuck 'for his own good'.
The post Declined: Chapter 17: Butterflies appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4You made the error, the good was neither faulty or whatever. So it was up to you to make the correct purchase. The owners of the shop is a scabby so and so all the same.
Just had a quick look at these websites
Government OASIS site:
http://www.oasis.gov.ie/consumer_affairs/?CONTACTSID=42a26b5f509dd09347be896791093696
and the Office of the Director of Consumer Affairs:
http://www.odca.ie/
Many clothes shops I know of do allow you to exchange goods or issue credit notes even though they aren't required to do so by law. Even in cases where the customer is entitled to a refund (faulty goods) it seems that the legislation doesn't say it has to be cash i.e. it can be a credit note or voucher.
... if something is 'faulty'.
If you buy something and it doesn't function in the way you would expect it to, or if it doesn't do the job that it claims to do etc.
If you had bought a book with missing pages, or pages stuck together or blank pages or something like that you'd have been entitled to a full cash refund. Unfortunately in this case, you're not.. You should expect some manners though or even good business sense and I would think that to have offered you a credit note or an exchange would be good business practise, at least you could have walked away with another book of your choice, shop still has your cash, everybody happy. Most shops will have the sense to do that and it's good manners. But now you won't go to that shop again.
If you buy a knife that's blunt, or a lighter that doesn't light, or a cd that skips, or a rainjacket that lets in water or the like, you are entitled by law to ask for and expect to get your money back. Credit notes or vouchers are bullshit attempts by retailers to keep your cash. You should always insist on the cash.
Basically the rule is, the goods that you buy should be expected to live up to what you expect those goods to do. If not, and even if the goods are used, like a pair of leaky wellies which you only found out were leaking after spending a day in the woods, you're still entitled to your cash refund.
If its not a legal requirement what can explain the rise in the amount of shops which offer easy refunds and exchanges?
Here's the bit i bet you didn't know, okay you probably did i just wanted to feel brainy..
Many clothing chains have made refunding and exchanging clothing easier as part of the whole marketing communications effort to ease peoples dissatisfaction with their retail experience as therapy. Everyone likes going out and buying tat to feel good about themselves, often when we get home we decide that what we bought was indeed tat, and a waste of too much money, we then feel a deep sense of guilt, if this guilt remained we would learn our lesson and buy less tat. If we tried to return it and were refused that guilt creates unpleasant feelings about the retailer who will not ease our imagined suffering.
However if it is made easy for us to return the item we are more likely to return and buy more tat, thus we bypass the need to learn the lesson. there is no longer any guilt involved. This also works on a second level where we put the item back in the bag and place it in the bottom of the wardrobe with the intention of returning it, although this will never happen, this illogical act is enough in most cases to negate the guilt. Fortunately for shops the amount of people who delude themselves and the consumer satisfaction caused by the removal of guilt leads to higher spending. Also on a high percentage of occasions refunded monies are then used to purchase something cheaper immediately afterwards in the same shop. It's win, win.
In this way marketing communications has removed much of the guilt from hedonistic and reward shopping thus making shopping as a pleasurable and therapeautic experience slide much more easily into our psyche
That explains why all those places offer refunds and exchanges, its not because they care about your legal rights its all about creating a more pleasurable and alluring consumer enviroment so that you'll spend more in the long run.
I can tell you from personal experience that wandering into the wrong sections of libraries can be very informative, much more informative than reading the work of those who oppose something. Get it from the horses mouth, its amazing what people blithely admit to in publications aimed at educating their industry, childrens advertising and marketing is especially eye opening
So from this you can guess that this book shop was too cheap to even learn the basics of marketing communications. I get the feeling that you are dissatisfied and might not shop there again unless neccessary, unfortunately all this means is that marketing communications work, those who gain your confidence in order to increase the amount of your money they take in the end are the ones we view in a favourable light.
On the other hand that shop owner is just an unthinking git, a little bit of kindness and manners would do him the world of good