Latest dtaft of EU data retention measures expand Garda powers of request
Ireland has not yet implemented the EU Directive on data retention, a set of measures full of controversy and conflicting interests. The latest draft towards an Irish implementation expands Garda powers to request data on subjects charged with offences attracting a MAXIMUM sentence of 6 months, as opposed to the previous draft in which a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years. Such a broad power would include activists charged with public order offences (obstruction, refusing to move on, placarding), permitting access to the time, number and duration of phone calls and lists of websites visited and IP addresses of data packets sent.
It would seem that only Fiona O'Malley has taken any interest in the civil liberty impacts of the draft text working towards a first Bill implementing the EU Directive in Ireland, having asked for an update on 14 February (http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewpda.asp?DocID=8794 and http://debates.oireachtas.ie/DDebate.aspx?F=SEN20080214...age=6).
In the meantime An Garda appears to have significant leeway to interpret data requests under the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005, allowing access to data held over the past 6 YEARS - despite the intervention of the Data Commissioner requiring that the EU Directive and a limit of six MONTHS be imposed as soon as practicable.
An article in today's Irish Times (http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/frontpage/2008/0422/12....html) outlines the issues, but does not do justice to the seriousness of the current lack of legislation, the absence of a Bill discussion link on www.oireachtas.ie (as would be normal for most legislation) and the ongoing "informal" interpretation of anti-Terror legislation in place of the EU Directive.