New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Now Scientists Claim Near 20-Year Stable Arctic Sea Ice is ?Unsurprising? and Predicted by Models Mon Apr 28, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison
After decades of pushing the climate alarmist narrative that arctic ice is melting fast, scientists have now claimed that the near 20-year stable Arctic sea ice is "unsurprising" and predicted by their models.
The post Now Scientists Claim Near 20-Year Stable Arctic Sea Ice is “Unsurprising” and Predicted by Models appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Home Affairs Select Committee Report on the Southport Riots Gets One thing Right ? the Authoriti... Mon Apr 28, 2025 07:00 | Laurie Wastell
In the Daily Sceptic, Laurie Wastell reviews the Home Affairs Select Committee's report on the Southport riots and concludes that MPs distrust the public almost as much as the public distrusts them.
The post The Home Affairs Select Committee Report on the Southport Riots Gets One thing Right ? the Authorities Shouldn?t Have Withheld Information About the Attacker For so Long appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Mon Apr 28, 2025 01:00 | Toby Young
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Why War Trumps Peace Sun Apr 27, 2025 17:29 | Ramesh Thakur
What if warfare is the normal condition of human society, and peace the exception that requires explanation? Ramesh Thakur looks at some longstanding conflicts and asks how peace might be finally achieved.
The post Why War Trumps Peace appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link In Defence of Adolescence: A Deeply Subversive Satire of Post-Liberal Britain Sun Apr 27, 2025 15:00 | Michael Rainsborough
Michael Rainsborough watched Adolescence expecting to see stale, regime propaganda. In fact, he thinks it's a deeply subversive, vituperative satire of post-liberal Britain.
The post In Defence of Adolescence: A Deeply Subversive Satire of Post-Liberal Britain appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en

offsite link Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en

offsite link The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

US gives Japan the green light to arm up

category international | anti-war / imperialism | opinion/analysis author Thursday August 04, 2005 16:26author by Peter McCrossanauthor email petermccrossan at gmail dot com Report this post to the editors

Japan, after consideration and debate over a two year peiod, looks set this year to alter
it's pacifist enshrined constitution. The Japanese government while clearly more right
leaning and nationalistic than of late, clearly echoes the sentiment of a certain proportion
of the Japanese people. With the North Korean nuclear threat and the ever growing strength of China,
Japanese people could be forgiven for being somewhat insecure, However it is mainly because
of the US backing prime minister Koizumi has received that he has felt as secure in
throwing his weight about recently in south east asia.

Japan, after consideration and debate over a two year peiod, looks set this year to alter
it's pacifist enshrined constitution. The Japanese government while clearly more right
leaning and nationalistic than of late, clearly echoes the sentiment of a certain proportion
of the Japanese people. With the North Korean nuclear threat and the ever growing strength of China,
Japanese people could be forgiven for being somewhat insecure, However it is mainly because
of the US backing prime minister Koizumi has received that he has felt as secure in
throwing his weight about recently in south east asia.
Although several instances have occured of late whereby Japan has 'soured' it's relations
with its neighbors , a set of new history textbooks approved by the Japanese government
earlier this year has been the biggest source of regional tension. Both the Chinese and
South Korean governments claim the books seek to glorify Japans war-time past and to gloss
over war-time attrocities committed by it's troops. This includes the kidnapping and use as
comfort women of hundreds of thousands of Korean women.
However the most controversy has been caused by a book written by a group of nationalist historians
called the Society for History Textbook Reform. Its first version, published in 2001, caused
Korea to recall its ambassador in Tokyo for nine days in protest.
It refers to the Japanese slaughter of some 300,000 civilians in the Chinese city of Nanjing
as an "incident", rather than the "massacre" as it is known as elsewhere. Tokyo approved this amd other books.
A rational person must surely question the American backing for the military build up of a country
that seems so unable or unwilling to admit it's past mistakes.
Imagine if the country in question was Germany.

In March this year US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made visits to Tokyo, Beijing and Seoul.
Her tour of the region served to underscore the new Administration policy of trying to set
Japan into motion against the growing economic and political clout of China in the region.
In her Tokyo speech on March 21 Rice stated that Japan would be the ‘umbrella’
for US policy in Asia, since both Tokyo and Washington
"have already chosen a common set of values and understandings".
To further emphasis US intentions she talked about the "rise of China as a new factor in global politics."
While this is obviously true both her negative tone and the city she was delivering her
address in gave another edge to her words. "The internal evolution of China is still undefined"
Rice added, naming "issues of freedom of religion, human rights…Taiwan" as
"matters of concern that could take a wrong turn."
She stated, provocatively, "we want to prod, push and persuade China…"
The fact that she delivered these remarks in China was undoubtedly to let Beijing know that
Washington had China on it's watch list.During her Asia tour Rice repeatedly stressed that Washington
would back Japan in the region and supported the Japanese desire for permanent UN Security Council
veto status. While undoubtedly China needs to have severe pressure applied for reform on several fronts,
most noteably human rights issues, it appears to me that all America seems to be doing is creating fronts
in the south east asian region. Something tells me that with John Bolton finally pushed through as US
ambassador to the UN, things will get worse before they get better.

author by Mikepublication date Fri Aug 05, 2005 00:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Why did you think that the US was taking no action about North Korea except to "nudge" the Japanese toward rearmament?

When everybody talks about the lousy state of the US economy they forget that this is only if things go on the way they have been going no without a MAJOR change like the Japanese deciding to rearm.

Oh --- and though it's on another thread I'd like to comment on something said there that relates to this. No, my friends, selling arms to combatants is not a violation of neutrality. Not in the sense of what the term means in the laws between nations. Being neutral means you get to become rich selling arms to BOTH sides.

 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy